Meanwhile, the Art of Living said it is exploring the option of challenging the tribunal's order in the Supreme Court.
"We find the verdict unjust and, if need be, after reviewing the order we will go to the Supreme Court, We have not violated any law or done any wrong," said an AoL statement. "We don't agree with the tribunal's observations. The Art of Living has neither polluted air, water or earth. We have left the WCF site in a better condition than what we got. We have an extensive repertoire for environmental work and find these allegations unacceptable," said the statement.
"What a section of the media is enthusiastically calling a fine is not a fine but a compensation deposit." The AoL claimed that the NGT passed the order on a report prepared on the basis of a mere visual inspection and that no scientific assessment of the site was done.
"We have been asked to compensate an amount arrived at arbitrarily. The damage has not even been assessed," the AoL said.