SAN FRANCISCO, CA - Silicon Valley venture capitalist Vinod Khosla has lost an appeal to bar public access to a beach property under his name. The story assumes significance on two fronts. It is an issue of public-rights access in a country whose Constitution fiercely guards the right to private property. News organizations also peg it as a victory in the growing class disparity between the multi-millionaires of Silicon Valley and rest of the citizenry.
The idyllic beach, called Martin’s beach, has been the pride of surfers and beachgoers for more than a century. In 2008, Sun Microsystems co-founder Vinod Khosla bought the property for $ 32.5 million, which included the road to Martins Beach. Khosla, a graduate of the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi had cut off access to the beach with gates and by posting private security guards since 2009.
Several trespassing cases were also taken up with the law enforcement agencies. A series of legal battles have been going on since 2009 which were spear-headed by the Surfrider Foundation, the prosecutor in the case.
In 2014, a New York Times report stated that the Surfrider Foundation filed an appeal against Khosla for violating the Coastal Act of 1976 as he didn’t take up the required permissions from the state before barring access to the beach.
It was even reported that the government attempted to gain access to the Martins Beach road for a sum of $300,000. Khosla asked for $ 30 million.
Khosla ran another suit in 2016 where he stated that powerful state agencies were violating his rights as stipulated under the Constitution. In what is a blow to Khosla, the court, in the case pertaining to Martin’s beach access, has nullified his claim to block access to the beach. Khosla has also been directed by the court to pay $ 500,000 which will go towards legal fees meant for Surfriders Foundation. Khosla can still appeal to the Supreme Court on the decision. He has not taken off the gates.
Khosla’s networth is estimated to be above $ 1.55 billion.
Several trespassing cases were also taken up with the law enforcement agencies. A series of legal battles have been going on since 2009 which were spear-headed by the Surfrider Foundation, the prosecutor in the case.
In 2014, a New York Times report stated that the Surfrider Foundation filed an appeal against Khosla for violating the Coastal Act of 1976 as he didn’t take up the required permissions from the state before barring access to the beach.
It was even reported that the government attempted to gain access to the Martins Beach road for a sum of $300,000. Khosla asked for $ 30 million.
Khosla ran another suit in 2016 where he stated that powerful state agencies were violating his rights as stipulated under the Constitution. In what is a blow to Khosla, the court, in the case pertaining to Martin’s beach access, has nullified his claim to block access to the beach. Khosla has also been directed by the court to pay $ 500,000 which will go towards legal fees meant for Surfriders Foundation. Khosla can still appeal to the Supreme Court on the decision. He has not taken off the gates.
Khosla’s networth is estimated to be above $ 1.55 billion.
RSS Feed
